Legal Opinion
Higley v. Schlessman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 17, 1956No. 36957PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
On July 7, 1954, Learvill. N. Schlessman filed a claim from compensation against his employer, Chalmers and Borton, and insurance carrier, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, respondents herein, in which he states that on January' 4, 1954, while in the employ of Chalmers and Bor-ton he sustained an accidental injury consisting of an injury to his back resulting in a ruptured intervertebral disc and sciatica nerve injury. The accident occurred while working for his employer at Carnegie, Oklahoma. It occurred while he was pushing wire cable through a conduit and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conrad v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Wilson Drilling Co. v. BeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Wm. A. Smith Const. Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Reichle v. HazieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Standard Paving Co. v. LemmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Red Rock Mental Health v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Douglas Aircraft Company v. TitsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Bowling v. Blackwell Zinc CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Romero v. Workers' Compensation Court, CCB, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.