Blatz Brewing Co. v. Richardson & Richardson, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The right of appellant to recover in the garnishee action depends solely on whether the principal defendant, Richardson & Richardson, Inc., retained title to the draft in its negotiations with the bank. The intervening defendant, the respondent here, showed to the satisfaction of the trial court that the transaction was one of purchase and transfer of the draft and that a debtor-creditor relationship arose between the bank and the Richardson firm.
The trial court was of the opinion that by the weight of authority a draft deposited by a customer who receives credit from the bank as cash and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Vickers v. Machinery Warehouse & Sales Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Aebi v. Bank of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Edwards v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Plumas County Bank v. Bank of Rideout, Smith & Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rubio Savings Bank v. Acme Farm Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1949