Legal Opinion

Rubio Savings Bank v. Acme Farm Products Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 5, 1949No. 47335PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOliver, J.

— Defendant Acme Farm Products Company is a partnership composed of defendants Paul M. Ross and Han- nail J. Ross, husband and wife, of Chicago, Illinois, at which place the partnership is engaged in, the produce business. Weisz Produce was a trade name under which Maurice Weisz operated a produce business at Brighton, Washington County, Iowa. Early in 1947 Weisz Produce made a number of sales and shipments of eggs and poultry to Acme Farm Products Company. The checks received in payment were deposited by Weisz Produce in its account in plaintiff, Rubio Savings Bank, of Brighton. The two…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Davidson v. VastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Todd v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Acme Hay & Mill Feed Co. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Fitzgerald v. ArelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. Security Bank v. Northwestern Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fagen Elevator v. PfiesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. X-L Liquors, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. State v. HaesemeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Hanson v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
  5. Ballester v. Descartes, Treasurer of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API