Legal Opinion

In Re Ivey & Ellington, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 14, 1945PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, Chancellor:

There has been no corporate election since February 1st, 1943, and the petitioner’s right to a summary order, directing that a stockholders’ meeting be held for the election of directors, is not denied. The sole question is whether three or five directors shall be elected at that meeting. The by-laws provide that a stockholders’ meeting shall be held on February 1st of each year and that only three directors shall be elected. At the meeting held February 1st, 1943, five directors, including Ivey and Ellington, were, however, elected, and all but one have continued to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bay City Lumber Co. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Star Loan Ass'n v. MooreSuperior Court of Delaware · 1903
  3. Adelaide E. Buck v. Troy Aqueduct Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1903

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Comscape Telecommunications, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  2. Belle Isle Corporation v. MacBeanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
  3. Management Technologies, Inc. v. MorrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. In Re Osteopathic Hospital Association of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  5. Barsam v. Pure Tech International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API