State v. Fischer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Presiding Judge.
The State appeals from the trial court’s grant of Cheryl Fischer’s motion to suppress evidence, which was improperly designated as a motion in limine, in this DUI case. We affirm.
During the hearing on Fischer’s motion, the only witness called to testify was Officer Kotkiewicz. The State never requested or indicated that it desired a continuance to produce additional witnesses. Kotkiewicz’s testimony demonstrated that Fischer was stopped by Officer Vaughn at a roadblock conducted by Vaughn, Kotkiewicz and other uniformed members of the Lawrenceville Police Department DUI…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Teague v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Burgeson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- State v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- State v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Workman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- State v. PennymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Corbin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Commonwealth v. PrivetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.