Legal Opinion

State v. Pennyman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 5, 2001No. A00A1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

The State appeals the trial court’s grant of Michael Pennyman’s motion to suppress evidence resulting from a traffic stop. Because there was reasonable suspicion to authorize the stop, we reverse.

In reviewing the trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we defer to the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we construe the evidence most favorably to the trial court’s decision.

At the hearing on the motion to suppress, the officer who was driving the patrol car was unavailable to testify Officer Nowell, the passenger of the patrol car, testified…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Burgeson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Tarwid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Workman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Camp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. State v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. The State v. Preston.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. Spear v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API