Legal Opinion
Nanavati v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 2, 1986No. Civ. A. 83-0794, 84-1790PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COHEN, Senior District Judge:
This complex, multi-issue case, which included claims and counterclaims among Dr. Suketu H. Nanavati, Dr. Robert J. Sorenson, the Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hospital (“BTMH” or “the Hospital”) 1 and the Executive Committee of the Hospital’s Medical Staff (“the Executive Committee”) 2 was tried before a jury for nine weeks. Sixty-five witnesses were presented, nine lawyers and their staffs participated in the case, and eleven separate opinions, 4 before trial and 7 during trial, were filed by this Court. Forty-five special interrogatories were submitted to the jury.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McGuire v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Hassoun v. CimminoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Nanavati v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Nanavati v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Untracht v. West Jersey Health SystemDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.