Kevin O'Gorman v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
Kevin O’Gorman filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Chicago, alleging that the City violated his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process and equal protection in its actions surrounding his employment with the City. The district court granted the motion to dismiss O’Gorman’s amended complaint, and O’Gorman appeals that dismissal.
As is appropriate in the context of a motion to dismiss, we take as true the facts as set forth in the complaint along with all reasonable inferences. Thulin v. Shopko Stores Operating Co., LLC, 771 F.3d 994, 995 (7th Cir.2014).…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- Sidney Hillman Health Center o v. Abbott Laboratories, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Acacia Mental Health Clinic, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Amin Ijbara Equity Corp. v. Village of Oak LawnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Orgone Capital III, LLC v. Keith DaubenspeckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Ronald Forgue v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.