Legal Opinion

LTV Corp. v. Valley Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 23, 1991No. 90 Civ. 2974 (SWK), 90 Civ. 2975 (SWK), 90 Civ. 2977 (SWK), 90 Civ. 2978 (SWK), 90 Civ. 2989 (SWK), 90 Civ. 2993 (SWK), 90 Civ. 2994 (SWK) and 90 Civ. 2990 (SWK)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Valley Fidelity Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee, and Intervenor-Appellants Connecticut Bank and Trust Company, N.A., Connecticut National Bank, Hibernia National Bank in Texas, Huntington National Bank, IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Company, Maryland National Bank and Team Bank, appeal from the Memorandum Decision and Order of the Bankruptcy Court reported at 109 B.R. 51 and 111 B.R. 67 (Bkrtcy.S.D.N.Y.1990). 1

Sixty-six entities affiliated with the LTV Corporation filed petitions for reorganization pursuant to Chapter 11 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Chateaugay Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. In Re Allegheny International, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. In Re Chateaugay Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Chateaugay CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Pengo Industries, Inc. v. LichtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re G-I Holdings, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  4. In Re United States Lines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  5. Mt. Rushmore Hotel Corp. v. Commerce Bank (In Re Mt. Rushmore Hotel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API