In Re Chateaugay Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON BANKRUPTCY COURT’S JURISDICTION TO HEAR AND DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN PERSONAL INJURY TORT OR WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS ARE SUSTAINABLE AT LAW
BURTON R. LIFLAND, Chief Judge.
Bankruptcy courts are often called upon to allow or disallow claims in the context of motions to expunge claims based upon, inter alia: an applicable bar date in the bankruptcy proceeding; an applicable statute of limitations; res judicata; payment; release; discharge in bankruptcy; or some other basis which tends, if established, to negate the existence of a claim against a debtor. However, in light of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Roos v. RedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- United States Lines, Inc. v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (In Re United States Lines, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Flake v. Alper Holdings USA, Inc. (In Re Alper Holdings USA, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Chateaugay Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.