Barkeloo v. Randall
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Push Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
This was an action of trespass de bonis aspottatis. The defendants severed in their pleas. Randall pleaded that on the sixth of September, 1836, at, &c., the defendant, Kay, appeared before him, the said Randall, then and there being an acting justice of the peace in and for the county of Rush-, and made and filed his affidavit, stating, among other things, that the said Barkeloo was justly indebted to said Kay in the sum of 50 dollars, &c., and that Barkeloo so concealed himself, that the ordinary process of law could not be served upon him, &c. whereupon said Randall issued his writ *477of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wise v. WithersSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Gold v. BissellNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Vosburgh v. WelchNew York Supreme Court · 1814
- Johnson v. TompkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1833
- Curry v. PringleNew York Supreme Court · 1814
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Egan v. WoleverIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Turner v. ConkeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Faulkner v. BrigelIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Rosenthal v. Madison & Indianapolis Plankroad Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Rodde v. HollwegIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898