Legal Opinion

Rodde v. Hollweg

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1898No. 2,373PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From tbe Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

— Appellant sued appellees on an attachment bond. A demurrer for want of sufficient facts was sustained to the complaint, and this ruling *223is the only error assigned. The complaint sets out the complaint in the cause wherein the writ of attachment was issued, the bill of particulars attached to the complaint, the affidavit, writ, and undertaking in attachment. In the original proceedings Hollweg brought an action on an account, making Alex Hertz-man, Samuel Rodde and Saul Rodde, appellant, de-. fendants. In the first and second paragraphs of his complaint Hollweg alleged that Alex Hertzman and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Excelsior Fork Co. v. LukensIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Faulkner v. BrigelIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Barkeloo v. RandallIndiana Supreme Court · 1838
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ParishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Batten v. McCartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Maloney v. Jones-Wise Commission Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API