Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Brigel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1885No. 11,821PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Colerick, C.

This action was instituted by the appellees upon an attachment bond executed by the appellants. It appears by the averments in the complaint, that the appellant Faulkner, on the 21st day of May, 1879, commenced an action in the Jay Circuit Court against the appellees for damages, and with his complaint filed an affidavit for a writ of attachment, in which it was recited that the appellees were indebted to him in the sum of $3,500, the nature of which indebtedness was fully stated; that the claim was just, and that he ought to recover said sum, and that the appellee Brigel was a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maple v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Lipperd v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Harris v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Parker v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Moore v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. GilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Peters v. GuthrieIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Fetter v. PowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Durre v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Waring v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API