Legal Opinion

Steen v. Southern California Supply Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1925No. Docket No. 5183PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to recover damages alleged to have been caused by reason of the sale and delivery by the defendant to the plaintiff of a quantity of caramel coloring matter. The defendant answered and a trial was had before the trial court sitting with a jury. The jury brought in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on which judgment was entered and from that judgment the defendant has appealed. The appellant makes one point and that is that plaintiff’s recovery may be justified only by reason of an implied or expressed warranty of the caramel color.

Mr.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dounce v. . DowNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Chapman v. MurchNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  3. Bartlett v. . HoppockNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. Oneieda Manufacturing Society v. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  5. Crocker-Wheeler Electric Co. v. Johns-Pratt Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Stott v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Topeka Mill & Elevator Co. v. TriplettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API