Legal Opinion
Inland Waterways Co. v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided January 15, 1929PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Willis
— Reversing.
This appeal involves the validity of a lease given by the city of Louisville upon real property held by it, but not presently utilized, for wharf purposes. The Inland Waterways Company complains of a judgment declaring ■ the lease invalid. The leased lands front upon the Ohio river and were acquired by deeds to the city for ultimate use for landings and wharves. They are not now needed by the city for that purpose, and it is not prepared to use them immediately for a public wharf or landing. Until such time as the city may so require the lands,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- People Ex Rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Transportation Co. v. ParkersburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Faulconer v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
- Faulconer v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
- Booth v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- E.M. Bailey Distributing Co. v. Conagra, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Miller v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.