Stewart v. Stewart

On this motion by the plaintiff wife to punish the defendant husband for contempt for disobedience of a court order with respect to alimony payments, the only issue in opposition worthy of note is the contention of the defendant that the plaintiff has not shown that sequestration of the defendant’s property is unavailable and that therefore the motion must be denied (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1172).

As they appear from the motion papers presently presented, from those on a companion application, and from the filed papers, the facts relevant to the resolution of the issue are as follows: The action is…