Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Patterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The court was without power to order a sequestration of defendant’s monthly earnings to become due. There must be a definite property right in the husband in order that the wife obtain relief by way of sequestration under sections 1171 or 1171-a of the Civil Practice Act. Where, as here, defendant is entitled to nothing except payment of services to be performed, his earnings accruing subsequent to the time of the appointment of a receiver cannot be reached by plaintiff in sequestration. (Valentine v. Williams, Inc., 159 N. Y. Supp. 815; affd., 179 App. Div. 884; affd., 223 N. Y. 574;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rolt-Wheeler v. Rolt-WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Valentine v. . Jno. Williams, IncorporatedNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Valentine v. Jno. Williams, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. La Hondere v. La HondereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Kloeppel v. KloeppelNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Kunzeck v. KunzeckNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Neidorf v. NeidorfNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Stewart v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API