Patterson v. Patterson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The court was without power to order a sequestration of defendant’s monthly earnings to become due. There must be a definite property right in the husband in order that the wife obtain relief by way of sequestration under sections 1171 or 1171-a of the Civil Practice Act. Where, as here, defendant is entitled to nothing except payment of services to be performed, his earnings accruing subsequent to the time of the appointment of a receiver cannot be reached by plaintiff in sequestration. (Valentine v. Williams, Inc., 159 N. Y. Supp. 815; affd., 179 App. Div. 884; affd., 223 N. Y. 574;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rolt-Wheeler v. Rolt-WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Valentine v. . Jno. Williams, IncorporatedNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Valentine v. Jno. Williams, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- La Hondere v. La HondereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Kloeppel v. KloeppelNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Kunzeck v. KunzeckNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Neidorf v. NeidorfNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Stewart v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.