Legal Opinion
Pyrate Corp. v. Sorensen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 27, 1930No. 6138PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, who will hereinafter be referred to as the plaintiff, entered into a contract with the defendants Sorensen and Dee, who will hereinafter he referred to as the defendants, giving to the defendants the exclusive right to manufacture and sell Pyrate products within tho state of California for a period of twelve months from the date of the contract, July 10, 1925, with certain renewal privileges. This proviso of the contract with reference to renewal is the only question involved on the appeal; plaintiff contending that the contract had been renewed and that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kelly v. VarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Street-Whittington Co. v. SayresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Hall v. WillmeringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Rutledge & Taylor Coal Co. v. Mermod, Jaccard & King Jewelry Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922
- Jacob Dold Packing Co. v. Kings County Refrigerating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beatty Safway Scaffold, Inc. v. SkrableCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Sorensen v. Pyrate Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Keller v. Pacific Turf ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961