Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Zhuk

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 20, 2010No. 09SC184PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid

The People challenge the Arapahoe County District Court's decision to dismiss their interlocutory appeal under Crim. P. 37.1 as untimely. The People argue that the district court erred in holding that the ten-day time period for filing an appeal under Crim. P. 37.1 is ten calendar days. Instead, they claim that the proper calculation of the ten-day time period must exclude intervening Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays pursuant to C.A.R. 26(a) We agree, and hold that the time period for filing appeals under Crim. P. 87.1 is subject to the calculation procedure provided in C.A.R. 26(a),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. ShellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. Leaffer v. ZarlengoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. People v. MeltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. ManzoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. Smith v. Executive Custom Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, L.L.C. v. FloodSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  2. People v. BlueColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. In re Estate of OwensColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  5. People v. DavisColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API