Keystone Land & Development Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Xerox Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge.
This diversity case arises from a contract dispute. Plaintiff Keystone Land & Development Company (“Keystone”) claims that it formed two binding contracts with Defendant Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”): a contract to buy a building owned by Xerox, and a contract to negotiate the terms of a Purchase and Sale Agreement for that building. Keystone filed suit for breach of contract in Washington state court and, to secure its claims, Keystone filed a lis pendens notice for the property. Xerox removed the case to federal court and filed a counterclaim for damages, and attorney’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Evans, Inc. v. Tiffany & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- Venture Associates Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Keystone Land & Development Co. v. Xerox Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Butler v. BaloliaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Queen Anne Park Homeowners Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Centurion Properties III, LLC v. Chicago Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Columbia Park Golf Course, Inc. v. City of KennewickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.