Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 8, 1996No. 94-257TPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The above-captioned case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for partial dismissal, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant claims that this court does not have jurisdiction, pursuant to the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (1988 & Supp. 1994), over counts1 II and III of plaintiffs complaint. Defendant argues that those counts allege either tort claims or due process claims under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, over which this court does…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Betz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  2. Christman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Adamowicz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Kimble v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API