Legal Opinion

Christman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 6, 2013No. 11-717 TPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tax; Refund Suit, 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (2006); Additions to Tax, 26 U.S.C. §§ 6651(a)(2), 6654 (2006); No Reasonable Cause, or Other Statutory Provision, to Excuse Taxpayers from Tax Penalties.

OPINION

Bush, Judge.

This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). These motions have been fully briefed, and oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor deemed necessary by the court. The disposi-tive issue before the court is whether the decision by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to grant…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Albemarle Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Noffke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Gonzales Ex Rel. Gonzales v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Bgt Holdings LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  5. ESTATE OF AGNES R. SKEBA v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API