Legal Opinion

City of Sharonville v. American Employers Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 2004No. C-030905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} In this insurance-coverage dispute, the insured claims coverage. Unsurprisingly, the insurance companies disclaim any coverage.

{¶ 2} Plaintiff-appellant, the city of Sharonville, and third-party defendants-appellants, Michael Schappa, James Cramer, and William Nuss (collectively, “Sharonville”), appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for defendants-appellees, American Employers Insurance Company and State Auto Insurance Company (together, “General Liability Insurers”), and Scottsdale Insurance Company, United National Insurance Company,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hybud Equipment Corp. v. Sphere Drake InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Preferred Risk Insurance v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Sharonville v. American Employers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ohio Govt. Risk Mgt. Plan v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Sharonville v. Am. Employers Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API