Legal Opinion

Beckmann v. Phœnix Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the. Franklin Circuit Court. — Hon. Rudolph Hirzel, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

On the twenty-fifth of January, 1890, the plaintiff recovered judgment agains.t the defendant in a suit upon a policy of fire insurance. Oh the same day the court adjourned until February 4, which was a day within the same term of court; on the seventh of February the defendant filed its motion for new trial, which was by the court overruled on May 29, also during the said term of court. At a subsequent day of the term leave was given defendant to file its bill of exceptions on or before November 17,1890. On November 17, which was during the November term of the court, by consent of all…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  3. Pier v. HeinrichoffenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Welsh v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. National Bank of the Metropolis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pannell v. Missouri Insurance Guaranty Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Catlin v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Maloney v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Propst v. Capital Mutual Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. State v. KinnamonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API