Legal Opinion

Holt v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1938No. 26810PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

A decision in this case turns upon the interpretation to he given the word “heirs” as used by Enoch Miller in the fifth item of his will.

Applicable here is the language of this court in Weston v. Weston, 38 Ohio St., 473, 478, as follows:

“We readily concur in the proposition * * * that the term heirs, when used in a will, is' flexible, and should be so construed as to give effect to the manifest intention of the testator as ascertained by a due consideration of all the provisions of the will. But this proposition in no wise conflicts with the well-established rule of construction, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Miller, Admr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Miller v. Miller, Admr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Casey v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tootle v. TootleOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Boulger v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Jones, Admr. v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Hamilton, Exr. v. PettiforOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API