Legal Opinion

Boulger v. Evans

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1978No. 77-378PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

Certain preliminary issues are raised by the judgment of the Court of Appeals. That court determined that the trial court was in error in overruling the pretrial motion made by Carol Roll to require that the state of Ohio be joined as a party to the proceeding.

Under the statute of descent and distribution (R. C. 2105.06), there is the possibility that none of the named classes of beneficiaries in fact, in a given case, exist. Where then there is no will or there is a will but it failed to dispose of all the property of a decedent, and the named classes of beneficiaries under R. C. 2105.06 do…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Love v. TupmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Holt v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sullivan v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Burr v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Wood v. McClelland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Bogar v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API