Legal Opinion
Moore v. Williamson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 16, 1925No. 8 Div. 672PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The first appeal is reported as Moore v. Williamson, 210 Ala. 427, 98 So. 201.
At the second trial plaintiff added a count for work and labor done in the sale of land, and it was sought by plea 4 to show a modification of the written contract declared upon. Demurrer was sustained to the plea. The fact of a subsequent revocation or modification of an executory contract is required to be presented by special plea, as was sought to be done by defendants. Newton v. Brooks, 134 Ala. 269, 32 So. 722; Sanders v. Williams, 163 Ala. 454, 50 So. 893; Code 1907, § 5331; 7 Mayfield’s Dig. p. 718. See…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Stoudenmeier v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Shriner v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Elliott v. HowisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Formby v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Hand Lumber Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Allstar Homes, Inc. v. WatersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Crimson Industries, Inc. v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Adler v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- The Industrial Development Board of the Town of Section, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc., the Industrial Development Board of the City of Fort Payne, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. MaplesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.