Legal Opinion

Atta v. Sun Co., Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-1446PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Darlene Atta, alleges in her complaint that she is a black female and that she was a management level employee of the defendant, Sun Company, Inc., also known as Sun Refining and Marketing Company, from 1969 through January 17, 1983. The complaint alleges that although the plaintiff performed competently in each capacity in which she was employed by the defendant from 1969 until 1983, her performance rating was lowered in May of 1982, and her employment status was changed from that of “permanent exempt, salaried employee” to that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matthews v. FreedmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Powers v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2000
  3. Dolla v. Unicast Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Hurst v. BeckDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API