Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Beck
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 15, 1991No. 91-2492PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUTTON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint and to Dismiss Richard Levine, M.D.; Plaintiffs’ response thereto; and Defendants’ reply. For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs, Wendy R. Hurst, M.D. (“Dr. Hurst”) and Richard Levine, M.D. (“Dr. Levine”), commenced this action on April 17,1991 against William W. Beck, Jr., M.D. (“Dr. Beck”), Dr. John Doe and the Pennsylvania Hospital (the “Hospital”). Doctors Beck and Doe are alleged to have…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Suzanne J. GOSS, Appellant in No. 83-1598 v. EXXON OFFICE SYSTEMS COMPANY, Appellant in No. 83-1557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gallo v. John Powell Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Price v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Xiao-Yue Gu v. Hughes STX Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Stilley v. University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Rodgers v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992