Legal Opinion

Sudden & Christenson v. Morse

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1909No. 7999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered October 12, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

This was an action upon a dishonored check, given by appellant to respondent, the defense being the failure of respondent to obtain an option for the purchase of a certain steamship, for the use and benefit of the appellant, the check being given for the purpose of obtaining such option, and as a first payment thereunder. It was also contended that, in its negotiations for such option, respondent acted contrary to its agreement with appellant, and with intent to defraud him, and a claim for damages resulting from such fraud was interposed. A reply denying these affirmative allegations was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCorkle v. MalloryWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Mercier v. Travelers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ticknor v. Seattle-Renton Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Farnandis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Cramer v. CramerWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Loy v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. McDorman v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API