Legal Opinion

Farnandis v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1917No. 13713PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered June 6, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the Court

Webster, J. —

This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the removal of lateral support. During the years 1907, 1908, and 1909, the city of Seattle caused Main and Jackson streets to be regraded between Tenth and Twelfth avenues in such manner as to necessitate a cut of approximately eighty-six feet, which reached daylight at. Twelfth avenue and Jackson street; that is, the grades met at that point. The earth on the north side of Jackson street was of such character that, when the cut was made, it developed a tendency to slide into the street. The sliding continued…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jorguson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Doran v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hase v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Gray v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hieber v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Island Lime Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Ticknor v. Seattle-Renton Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Marquardt v. Federal Old Line InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. Weller v. Snoqualmie Falls Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API