Legal Opinion
Plymouth County Nuclear Information Committee, Inc. v. Energy Facilities Siting Council
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 12, 1978PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
On April 30, 1976, the Boston Edison Company (Edison) filed with the Energy Facilities Siting Council (council) a long-range forecast of electric power needs. This forecast, which was filed in compliance with G. L. c. 164, § 691, stated that Pilgrim Station Unit 2 (Pilgrim 2), a nuclear generating plant then proposed to be operational in Plymouth in 1982, was an exempt facility. The principal issue in these appeals is whether Pilgrim 2, a majority of which Edison will own, is exempt from the review and approval provisions of G. L. c. 164, §§ 691 and 69J. We agree with the council’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Save the Bay, Inc. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- ALBRE MARBLE & TILE CO. INC. v. GovermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Trustees of Clark University v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Arnold v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Beeler v. DowneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Care & Protection of RobertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Attorney General v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. Connor C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.