Legal Opinion

Hegewald v. Neal

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 27, 1978No. 2624-2PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSoule, J.

Tenancy in common, like marriage, can be an unhappy relationship and the process of dissolution may be prolonged, painful and expensive.

This is a partition action brought pursuant to RCW 7.52.010. The property was originally homesteaded by ancestors of the St. Martins. They now retain a one-fifth interest. The evidence reveals that it is an unusually complex property in its composition. It consists, in part, of a plateau area with some timber of no more than modest commercial value on the west side of the Wind River. The grade is gentle; the area is approximately 140 acres, 126 of which are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Williamson Investment Co. v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Cross v. CrossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Huston v. SwanstromWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Hamlin v. HamlinWashington Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carson v. WillstadterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. Overlake Farms B.l.k. Iii Llc, App. v. Bellevue-overlake Farm, Llc, Resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Carr v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. Hegewald v. NealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. TRI-COUNTY CENTER TRUST v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API