Huston v. Swanstrom
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
The plaintiffs by their complaint sought to have certain real estate owned by them and the defendant Mary E, Swanstrom, as tenants in common, sold under a decree of the court and the proceeds of the sale distributed to them in proportion to their respective interests.. The defendant in her answer set up, in addition to a general denial, two affirmative defenses: (1) -That, if a forced sale of the premises was presently made, under present market conditions, it would he wholly destructive of the interests of both parties, particularly those of the defendant; and that plaintiffs had wil-fully…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. OlmstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Hamilton v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Williamson Investment Co. v. WilliamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Truth Lodge No. 213 v. BartonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Porter v. WingertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- De Roulet v. MitchelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Schultheis v. SchultheisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Carter v. Weowna Beach Community Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Hegewald v. NealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Overlake Farms B.l.k. Iii Llc, App. v. Bellevue-overlake Farm, Llc, Resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016