Legal Opinion

David Neely v. Benchmark Family Services

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 26, 2016No. 15-3550UnpublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

David Neely appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Benchmark Financial Services on his state and federal disability discrimination and retaliation claims, as well as a state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Because Neely has neither shown that he is qualified as disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act, nor shown that he engaged in a “protected activity,” we affirm the grant of summary judgment.

I

Plaintiff David Neely claims to have long suffered from sleeping problems, sometimes getting only…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Chen v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Gianni-Paolo Ferrari v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Paula Babb v. Maryville Anesthesiologists, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Haley Hrdlicka v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  4. Pena v. City of FlushingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Mullenix v. Eastman Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API