Legal Opinion

Medina v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1999No. 23709Published

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CUEIAM.

Steven John Medina appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his application for post-conviction relief. Medina had asserted that both pre-trial and trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance when they failed to object to the state’s use of a sentence enhancement even though the state had not notified the defendant in writing of its intention to use the enhancement prior to-the preliminary hearing. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Following a drive-by shooting, eye-witnesses identified the gunman as Medina. On August 9,1993, he was arrested and charged with aggravated assault…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Larkin v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Follinus v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API