Legal Opinion
Ichizo Sato v. Hall
California Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1923No. Sac. No. 3249PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment of the superior court refusing to issue a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, the county clerk of Sacramento County, to place petitioner’s name on the register of voters.
On January 21, 1919, petitioner was admitted to citizenship by the United States district court of the territory of Hawaii, and a certificate of citizenship was thereupon issued to him. This certificate recites that he is a member of the yellow race, and that at the time of his admission he was a subject of the emperor of Japan. Petitioner presented his certificate to defendant, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- In re YamashitaWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- In re Buntaro KumagaiDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Sharpensteen v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- In Re HullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Rhodes & Jamieson, Ltd. v. California State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.