Rhodes & Jamieson, Ltd. v. California State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
The question on this appeal is whether a buyer who hauls purchased cement in his own truck from a place of manufacture to place of use and receives a credit from the seller in an amount (fixed by the latter) based upon what the seller regards to be the buyer’s cost of transportation is making a “specific charge for transportation” (which makes the transaction taxable) or is merely receiving a “price differential.”
The trial court held it was the latter and that the transaction was not taxable under the California Motor Vehicle Trans-License Tax Law. We with that conclusion.
Said law imposes a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Ichizo Sato v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dealers Installation Service, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970