Legal Opinion

Rhodes & Jamieson, Ltd. v. California State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1962No. Civ. 10263PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

The question on this appeal is whether a buyer who hauls purchased cement in his own truck from a place of manufacture to place of use and receives a credit from the seller in an amount (fixed by the latter) based upon what the seller regards to be the buyer’s cost of transportation is making a “specific charge for transportation” (which makes the transaction taxable) or is merely receiving a “price differential.”

The trial court held it was the latter and that the transaction was not taxable under the California Motor Vehicle Trans-License Tax Law. We with that conclusion.

Said law imposes a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Ichizo Sato v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dealers Installation Service, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API