Legal Opinion
State v. Pesentheiner
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 2001No. 22605PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
LIM, J.
Following a bench trial in the district court of the first circuit, Defendant-Appellant Armand Pesentheiner was convicted of harassment, in violation of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 711—1106(l)(a), and sentenced to pay a $100 fine. The fine was deducted from bail returned to him.
HRS § 711—1106(1)(a) (Supp.2000) provides that “[a] person commits the offense of harassment if, with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm any other person, that person ... [s]trikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise touches another person in an offensive manner or subjects the other person…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. NesmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. KalaolaHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Codiamat.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
- Fisher v. KealohaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Rincon Etal Investments Incorporated v. CoughranDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.