Legal Opinion

State v. Codiamat.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2013No. SCWC-11-0000540PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant State of Ha-wai'i (State) asks us to consider whether its complaint against Respondent/Defendant-Appellee Marianne L. Codiamat (Codiamat) provided sufficient notice to Codiamat of the charged offense to meet the constitutional requirements of due process. The State’s complaint charged Codiamat with harassment, in violation of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 711—1106(l)(a) (Supp.2010).1 Before the commencement of trial, the District Court of the First Circuit (district court)2 granted Codiamat’s motion to dismiss the State’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. BatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. MerinoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. JendruschHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. IsraelHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. SprattlingHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Nakamitsu.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. Vaimili.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. VaimiliHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API