Legal Opinion

Imel v. United States

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided May 9, 1974No. Civ. A. C-3264PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WINNER, District Judge.

This is an income tax refund case. The question as phrased in the government’s brief is:

“Whether the transfer of plaintiff’s appreciated property to his wife pursuant to a property settlement [agreement] was a taxable event such that plaintiff is liable for capital gains for the year 1965.” 1

Plaintiff adds a second question as to whether the depreciation of certain stocks transferred to a corporation should be offset against the appreciation of other stocks, but we do not reach that question in this opinion.

The government claims a tax only on transfers…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ray C. Imel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. Mann v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  3. Richard E. Wiles, Jr., and Karen B. Wiles v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  4. Giedinghagen v. GiedinghagenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. McIntosh v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API