Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hicks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 13, 1989No. 120-87Published

1DissentTeague, Judge

Because I find that a majority of this Court erroneously concludes that this Court’s decision to grant the petition for discretionary review that was filed on behalf of Johnny Logan Hicks, henceforth appellant, was improvident; therefore, the petition for discretionary review is ordered dismissed, I respectfully file this dissenting opinion.

The record reflects that after the jury panel in this cause was informed that the State’s burden of proof was beyond a reasonable doubt, Hon. Tim Evans, trial counsel for appellant, sought to ask the jury panel the following questions in the abstract:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Ratliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Hicks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API