Robinson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for capital murder. V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sec. 19.03(a)(2). After finding appellant guilty, the jury returned affirmative findings to the special issues under Art. 37.071(b), V.A. C.C.P. Punishment was assessed at death.
Appellant does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence.
Appellant relied on the defense of insanity. In his thirteenth ground of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred by sustaining the State’s objection to a question appellant sought to ask venireman Eula Winslett. The question was: “In any case…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- McManus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ratliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Guerra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Robison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Faulder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Robison v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.