Legal Opinion

Seagrave Corp. v. Mount Spain v. Mount

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1954No. 11915_1PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Circuit Judge.

Appellees, minority stockholders in The Seagrave Corporation, hereinafter called Seagrave, brought a stockholders’ derivative suit against Seagrave and its officers to enjoin them from carrying out a proposed transaction between Seagrave and Herbert A. Post, Incorporated, hereinafter called Post, which provided for the purchase by Seagrave from Post of all the common stock of The Fyr-Fyter Company, hereinafter called Fyr-Fyter, on the ground that it was unfair to Sea-grave and its stockholders and in violation of the fiduciary duty of the officers and dominant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Orvis v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. United States v. Consolidated Laundries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. United States Steel Corporation v. Barbara J. Fuhrman, Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur J. Fuhrman, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. Bayne v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Harris v. CarterCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1990

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API