Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 8, 1996No. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by plaintiff United States of America (“the Government”) against, inter alia, defendant International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“the IBT” or “the Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board. The settlement is embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goal of the Consent Decree is to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime through a two-phased implementation of the Consent Decree’s various remedial provisions. In the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of AzerbaijanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Weixing LiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Aerogroup International, Inc. v. Marlboro Footworks, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Monsanto Co. v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.