Legal Opinion

In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 21, 2005No. 03 MDL 1570(RCC), 02 Civ. 6977, 03 Civ. 6978, 03 Civ. 9849PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

CASEY, District Judge.

The Court presumes familiarity with the factual background giving rise to this mul-ti-district litigation. See In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 349 F.Supp.2d 765 (S.D.N.Y.2005) (“Terrorist Attacks I”). Generally, Plaintiffs are representatives, survivors, and insurance carriers of the victims of the attacks of September 11, 2001, who allege, pursuant to various theories of liability including the Antiterrorism Act (“ATA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2331 et seq.; the Alien Tort Claims Act (“ATCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1350; the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (Asat Trust Reg.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Russian Fed'nDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (Saudi Joint Relief Comm.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001District Court, S.D. New York · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API