Legal Opinion

Bombardier Aerospace Employee Welfare Benefits Plan v. Ferrer, Poirot and Wansbrough, Ferrer, Poirot and Wansbrough Steven Mestemacher

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 17, 2003No. 03-10195PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIENER, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough, P.C. (the “law firm”) and Steven Mestemacher appeal the district court’s grant of the summary judgment motion of Plaintiff-Appellee Bombardier Aerospace Employee Welfare Benefits Plan (the “Plan”), an ERISA-governed, self-funded employee welfare benefit plan, to enforce the terms of the Plan’s reimbursement provision against the law firm and Mestemacher. They also appeal the district court’s denial of their respective motions to dismiss the Plan’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Lane v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. ACS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. Longaberger Co. v. KoltCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API