Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Boston & Albany Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 14, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

By St. 1869, c. 174, the Athol and Enfield Railroad Company was chartered and authorized to locate, construct and operate a railroad from the Vermont and Massachusetts Railroad in Athol to connect with the New London Northern Railroad at Belchertown or Palmer, and by subsequent statutes to extend its railroad from the terminus in Belchertown through the towns of Ludlow and Wilbraham to the Boston and Albany Railroad, or the Connecticut River Railroad in Springfield. The St. 1873, c. 16, permitted the corporation to change its name to the Springfield, Athol and Northeastern Railroad Company,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Boston & Albany Railroad v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Attorney General v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Commonwealth v. SissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Attorney General v. Metropolitan RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Leahan v. CochranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Warner v. Mayor of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. County of Alameda v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Mayor of Cambridge v. DeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Commonwealth v. Stratton Finance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API