Legal Opinion

County of Alameda v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1961No. S. F. 20504PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

— The county of Alameda (hereinafter called the county) filed a complaint against Southern Pacific Company (hereinafter called Southern Pacific) and California Rock and Gravel Co. (hereinafter called Rock) for indemnity, arising out of the following facts-. On October 25, 1932, by resolution the county granted Rock a permit to construct, maintain and operate a spur track across a certain county road from the Southern Pacific tracks to Rock’s property. This was to be used by Southern Pacific to haul gravel from Rock’s property. The permit required Rock to “place the road ways back in the same…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. San Francisco Unified School District v. California Building Maintenance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Damiani v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bambridge v. WestermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bear Creek Planning Committee v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Wyoming Johnson, Inc. v. Stag Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API