Legal Opinion

Jads, Inc. v. Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1972No. Docket 12072, 12087, 12182PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

In these consolidated cases we hold that "topless go-go dancing” does not violate City of Detroit ordinances.

On May 14, 1969, defendant LaRue was performing her final dance of the night. She stripped off *695the two "pasties” (each was one-half of a flesh-colored bandaid) which had covered the nipple areas of her breasts, and danced totally nude above the waist. She was clad in black leotard tights below the waist.

A police officer, who was present during the entire performance, issued a ticket to LaRue when she removed her bandaids. She was charged, in the terms of the ordinance, with "indecent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. In Re GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Brooks v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. Willie JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. City of Westland v. OkopskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. KeenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Tally v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Moraco v. Wayne County ProsecutorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API